Skip to the Atlas premise
ATLAS SYSTEMS
A living systems design study

ATLAS21st-century ecosystem design

A community in rhythm
with its watershed.

Inspired by Buckminster Fuller’s whole-systems thinking, Atlas connects water, energy, shelter, learning and shared governance in a virtual community on the Lake Superior shore. Explore the ideas, inspect the relationships, and help imagine a place that sustains the life around it.

Structure, flow & feedbackC60 / Fullerene

C6060 vertices · 90 bonds

01

Observe the watershedBegin with the living landscape.

02

Design within itConnect shelter, water and habitat.

03

Measure & recalibrateModel, test and revise in public.

Lake Superior bioregion · 46°NConcept visualization · Virtual design studyDiscover below
The invitation · Build a better model
“You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
Widely attributed to R. Buckminster Fuller · Published by the Buckminster Fuller Institute ↗

Atlas takes this as a design brief: make another way of living tangible enough to examine, inhabit and improve. A better model earns its place through the lives it supports, the resources it preserves and the freedom it gives people to shape their common world.

The Premise

A better model begins with the living system.

Atlas is an exhibition and virtual design study built around a question inherited from Buckminster Fuller: how can civilization’s extraordinary technical capability support everyone aboard a finite, living planet? Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth establishes the shared system; Grunch of Giants questions its ownership and priorities; Critical Path asks how knowledge and resources can be organized into a different future. Atlas brings these questions into a place people can explore, challenge and improve.

Spaceship Earth: begin with what sustains us.

Operating Manual asks us to see water, food, energy, shelter and knowledge as connected conditions of life. Specialized knowledge becomes more useful when its consequences are understood across the whole. A settlement cannot be judged only by the income it generates: its success also depends on the soils, watersheds, habitats, labor and accumulated knowledge that make it possible. Atlas adopts this comprehensive perspective as its starting point. Read Operating Manual ↗

Who gets to coordinate the whole?

Atlas calls the present danger a specialist oligarchy: knowledge is divided among professions while the power to commission, finance and coordinate their work remains concentrated. The public encounters the fragments; those controlling the budgets can set the direction of the whole. Specialization is indispensable, but comprehensive understanding should not become a privilege of ownership. In Grunch of Giants, Fuller examines corporate power and the widening distance between financial accumulation and the capacity to support life.

Concentration can become self-reinforcing: acquisitions remove rivals, control of essential infrastructure raises barriers to entry, and entrenched advantages make the next expansion easier. A monopoly places a market under one dominant supplier; an oligopoly concentrates it among a few. Where wealth also buys disproportionate influence over public decisions, the danger becomes plutocracy. Atlas treats these as structural tendencies to examine and counter through shared knowledge, accountable institutions and distributed capacity. Their strength depends on the rules and choices of a society; concentration is not a universal law of every market. Fuller’s critique supplies questions for investigation, while particular claims about ownership and influence require evidence. Read Grunch of Giants ↗ · Consolidation and competition ↗ · Influence and public integrity ↗

Wealth is the capacity to sustain life.

Money coordinates investment and claims on production. It cannot substitute for dependable water, fertile soil, a maintained home or useful knowledge. Fuller’s livingry redirects attention toward tools, services and environments that support people. Atlas therefore places the financial account beside physical and human accounts: what a system consumes, what it restores, whom it serves and who carries its costs. Enterprise, invention and exchange earn their place through the life they help make possible.

Critical Path: make possibility inspectable.

Critical Path turns the comprehensive view toward action: inventory resources and needs, connect knowledge, identify prerequisites, compare alternatives, then prototype and measure. Fuller’s Geoscope and World Game invite people to see relationships and rehearse decisions together. For Atlas, the question becomes concrete: do the energy, materials, knowledge, sites and organization exist, and what must happen first? A promising model still needs operators, maintenance, ecological limits and public consent before it can become a working system. Explore Critical Path ↗

Learn to see relationships.

Synergetics supplies another lens: study arrangements and their surroundings alongside individual components. Geometry makes relationships visible; engineering and observation establish what a structure can do. Education Automation brings curiosity into the method. Visitors can follow a question from a book into a model, change an assumption, inspect the result and return to the source. The exhibition becomes an instrument for learning how to think across systems.

From a planetary perspective to a place to live.

Atlas carries this inquiry into a virtual community on the Lake Superior shore. Watershed and habitat, shelter and materials, energy and food, work and shared governance form one connected study. Fresco’s city-scale systems thinking informs its spatial organization. Water becomes circulation, energy becomes metabolism, and a digital twin makes flows and dependencies visible. These are design analogies: separate supplies, public-health requirements and engineering constraints remain explicit.

Two public ledgers guide the inquiry: the ledger of throughput records what is extracted, transformed, used and discharged; the ledger of return records what is repaired, safely reused, restored or returned to living systems. Both also ask who receives the benefits and who bears the work and risk. A watershed is the first test: every upstream decision has relationships beyond a property line. The Water-Bearer’s Codex ↗ develops the water side of this inquiry.

Shared understanding. Accountable power.

Synarchy, as Atlas uses the term, means shared rule supported by shared understanding. Accessible models, public accounts and independent scrutiny should distribute the capacity to coordinate. AI may help people cross disciplinary boundaries, but its ownership and decisions need the same scrutiny as any other infrastructure. Everyone deserves a voice in the systems sustaining them; participation must not depend on passing an expertise test.

Atlas begins virtually so useful connections can be examined before they are built. A physical prototype would grow through local partnership, site study, engineering, environmental review and measured results. The ambition is a community that keeps learning: make another way of living tangible, test what supports people and place, and carry the working relationships forward.

The Constellation

Seven modules, one organism.

Begin in CODEX, the knowledge base of Atlas. Navigate the books and their connected ideas, then take a question into the modules for enclosure, flows, operation, place, scenarios and governance. The compact practice area helps carry one inquiry across them.
I

CODEX

Knowledge & Synthesis

The visual knowledge base of Atlas. Explore eight Fuller reading entries, archival images and source-linked concepts within six expandable themes. Follow the connections into compact decision briefs and teaching models.

Enter →
II

GEODESICS

Shelter Program

The shell grammar of the city — hemispherical and spherical geodesics crowning mostly buried, earth-tempered foundations, from growing halls with rivers running through them to residence courts, the bathhouse, and the omnidirectional band shell. Inside — a drag-to-spin shell explorer up to 6V, a metered 50-foot dome for testing structural and energy assumptions, and the twelve pentagon nodes that distinguish the topology.

Enter →
III

HYDROS

Water & Hydrogen Works

The metabolism: water movement, energy conversion, storage, and thermal continuity. Proven devices such as hydraulic ram pumps and elevated reservoirs sit beside proposals for electrolysis, thermal storage, and experimental hydraulic works, each labeled by evidence status. Inside — a borehole head simulator, an interactive hydraulic ram and reservoir, and an animated electricity-to-hydrogen-to-heat pipeline. Follow the water, inspect the pressure pulses, and compare storage with release.

Enter →
IV

UTILITIES

The Works Registry

A proposed registry of twenty-one systems across water, energy, food and nutrients, materials, mobility and information. Follow each service into its strategy, dependencies, maintenance needs and indicators. Inside — a clickable works registry, an illustrative dashboard, and islanding considered separately for the essential services a community must sustain.

Enter →
V

TERRA

Shore & Masterplan

The ground truth: why Superior, why the Midcontinent Rift bedrock, and how the masterplan lays concentric canal rings over permaculture zones made municipal — harbor core, civic ring, canal districts, cultivation and agroforestry belts, and the wild margin that teaches them all. Inside — the interactive ring map with flowing canals, the rendered visions of the shore, and the two-season city with no off-season.

Enter →
VI

VIRTUAL ATLAS

The Living Twin

Fuller proposed a planetary inventory in 1961 and first played the World Game in 1969. Atlas translates that lineage into a VR-walkable civic instrument where proposals can be modeled before construction, predictions remain on the record, and difficult operating scenarios are rehearsed before they become emergencies. Inside — the documented lineage, model boundaries, and the stress deck.

Enter →
VII

SYNARCHY

Governance

Who decides — answered, not evaded. Quantities are estimated through published models and stated assumptions; purpose remains a human decision for named, rotating councils; the twin records what both predicted and compares it with later evidence. Inside — a decision router, a distributed-governance stress test, four rehearsed constitutional failures, and the six lines the framework lives by.

Enter →
Read across the modules

The relationships are the design.

A dome, a waterworks and a garden become a community through what passes between them. Atlas asks each module to account for those connections: where a flow begins, what makes it useful, who maintains it and what receives the remainder.

01 · Water, ground & habitat

Begin before the pipe.

The watershed is already working before a building arrives. Atlas would map seasonal flow, soils, wetlands and habitat before locating foundations or canals. The design question is how to meet human needs while keeping those relationships intact, with room for floods, ecological flows and the life downstream.

02 · Shelter, heat & energy

Let one decision serve several needs.

Study the shelter and its energy system together: first the comfort required and heat lost, then the supply and storage. A proposed heat exchange earns its connection only when temperature, distance and seasonal demand align. Insulation, equipment, growing spaces and maintenance all belong in that same decision.

03 · Work, care & the commons

A community must be livable.

Infrastructure is sustained by people who operate, repair, teach, grow and care. Atlas must ask how housing, shared meals, workshops, quiet places and accessible routes support that daily life. Its public account should reveal who does the work, who receives the benefit and who can challenge a decision.

The frame comes from Fuller's Comprehensive Anticipatory Design Science: understand the larger setting, trace the relationships and design toward a preferred future. These connections are Atlas's proposed application of that method.

The Method

Atlas is a move in a game Fuller started.

Fuller’s World Game approaches resources and human needs as a cooperative inquiry. Atlas applies that ambition at settlement scale: make the inventory visible, compare possible arrangements and examine who and what a choice affects. CODEX connects this ambition to the books through its Fuller Reading Room and mind map.

The ten-part model below is an Atlas teaching framework. Follow its questions into the relevant module, then compare what the proposal asks of its enclosure, flows, operators, place and institutions. Keep the assumptions and limits visible as the inquiry moves.

"Make the world work, for 100% of humanity, in the shortest possible time, through spontaneous cooperation, without ecological offense or the disadvantage of anyone."R. Buckminster Fuller · the World Game objective

This Atlas model groups the inquiry into ten parts. Select one to see its question and proposed application.

In Critical Path, inventories, development time and cooperative inquiry belong to a broader design program. CODEX connects that reading to the other books. Its compact practice area offers Atlas teaching examples for comparing alternatives, tracing dependencies and identifying the next evidence.

"Inventory the real system, define success for every affected party, sequence dependencies, simulate shocks, expose uncertainty and power — and reject any strategy that solves one place by hiding damage elsewhere."the Atlas restatement of the method
The Evidence Ledger

A future city must keep honest accounts.

Atlas is a design study, not a built settlement. Every number below carries a status, boundary, source, period, and uncertainty. Published regional context is not site data; an illustrative calculation is not measured performance; a target is not a result.

Project stateVirtual design study
Site baselineNot established
Measured operationsNone
Regional context Illustrative model Design target Measured result

Lake Superior sets the scale

Regional context

The lake is not an aesthetic backdrop. Its volume, shoreline, cold climate, drainage basin, and long nominal retention time define a demanding regional envelope for any shore-based proposal.

Water volume
12,100 km³
Water area
82,100 km²
Average depth
147 m
Nominal retention
191 years
Share of the five Great Lakes’ combined water volume. Percentages are calculated from EPA-published lake volumes.
View volume data and boundary
LakeVolume (km³)Share
Superior12,10053.3%
Michigan4,92021.7%
Huron3,54015.6%
Ontario1,6407.2%
Erie4842.1%

Source · U.S. EPA, Physical Features of the Great Lakes. The 191-year figure is a hydraulic retention estimate, not the age of every parcel of water or a pollutant-removal time.

A roof in the regional normal

Illustrative model

A transparent first-pass calculation turns a climate normal into a design question. For a 1,000-square-foot roof, Marquette’s 30.20-inch annual precipitation normal is equivalent to about 18,826 gallons before any losses.

1,000 ft²example roof
30.20 inannual normal
18,826 galgross equivalent
This is not a rainwater-system yield claim. A real design must subtract first-flush, overflow, snow and ice effects, evaporation, conveyance losses, storage limits, treatment needs, code constraints, and seasonal mismatch.

Method · 1 acre-inch is approximately 27,154 gallons, scaled to 1,000 ft². Sources · USGS Water Science School and the NOAA normal shown below.

The regional climate envelope

Station normal

Marquette’s 1991–2020 normals provide a representative regional reference: a 42.6°F annual mean, 30.20 inches of annual precipitation, and 102.0 inches of annual snowfall. They are not a substitute for a project-site weather record, microclimate study, or engineering design condition.

Marquette monthly normal high and low temperatures, 1991 through 2020 Normal highs rise from 24.6 degrees Fahrenheit in January to 74.6 in July. Normal lows rise from 12.4 in January to 58.1 in August. 80°F60°40°20°0° JANFEBMARAPR MAYJUNJULAUG SEPOCTNOVDEC
View the twelve-month source table
MonthHigh °FLow °FPrecip. inSnow in
Jan24.612.41.8625.1
Feb26.912.51.4720.9
Mar35.321.01.5914.2
Apr45.831.02.748.4
May58.740.82.900.3
Jun67.950.13.050.0
Jul74.657.73.110.0
Aug74.358.12.310.0
Sep67.351.63.340.0
Oct53.940.03.430.9
Nov40.628.52.4211.1
Dec30.218.61.9821.1

Source · NOAA NCEI, 1991–2020 U.S. Climate Normals, Marquette station USW00014838. Geography · Marquette, Michigan. Period · 1991–2020. Updated · source normal release.

From context to a defensible result

Atlas protocol

The exhibit now uses one public chain for every proposed performance number. A value moves to the right only when its source, units, boundary, method, date, and uncertainty travel with it.

ContextPublished regional data
BaselineMeasured site condition
ModelReproducible scenario output
TargetDeclared design objective
ResultMeasured operating performance
WaterPrecipitation, withdrawal, use, treatment, reuse, runoff, and dischargeAwaiting site baseline
EnergyCritical loads, generation, storage, conversion, imports, and lossesAwaiting load model
Food + soilYield, imports, nutrient flows, soil condition, and seasonal reliabilityAwaiting land inventory
MaterialsEmbodied carbon, service life, salvage, repairability, and final dispositionAwaiting bill of materials
Mobility + accessTrip distance, mode, travel time, critical access, and winter operationsAwaiting network model
Habitat + resilienceLand cover, biodiversity, runoff, autonomous hours, recovery, and confidenceAwaiting site and stress model
The empty states are intentional. Atlas will not display invented savings, autonomy, circularity, or resilience scores merely to make a dashboard look complete.
The Visions

The shore, rendered before it is poured.

Studies of the settlement from the visualization program — the masterplan rings, the canal districts, the growing halls, and the winter city at work. Select any image.
Aerial view of the Atlas masterplan
01 · The masterplan aerial — the rings on the water
Canal district street view
02 · A canal district, late summer
Grand garden commons interior by day
03 · The grand garden commons
Bathhouse district on a winter night
04 · The bathhouse district, winter night
Geometric neighborhood at dusk
05 · A neighborhood of the geometric family
Climate architecture cutaway
06 · The climate architecture, cut open
Growing hall interior at night
07 · A growing hall after dark
The Inheritance

Fuller supplied an epistemology. Fresco supplied a city-scale systems vision. Atlas tests what can be inherited, revised, or refused.

Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth establishes the shared system; Grunch of Giants questions its ownership and priorities; Critical Path investigates how it might be redesigned. Atlas brings those questions into a settlement people can inspect, challenge and improve.
Adopted

Prototype and measure · physical and human accounts beside finance · resource productivity tested across a service’s lifetime · World Game as cooperative inquiry · accessible models and public learning · the comprehensivist citizen.

Adapted

Fresco's ring-city topology mapped onto a Venetian canal fabric · manufactured buildings, amended to demountable bolted kits — a building unbolted is a material bank · the trim tab as institutional method.

Refused

Fuller's anti-politics and Fresco's silence on power · full abolition of money — the dual ledger runs indefinitely · the single central brain, replaced by a federated tensegrity of computation.

From the model to the ground

Build small. Learn in public.

A whole community is a destination, but a useful beginning can be one place and one well-defined question. The next step for Atlas is to identify a willing local partnership, understand its needs and choose a prototype small enough to maintain, measure and change.

  1. Listen and establish the baseline. Work with residents, land stewards and relevant Indigenous communities to understand the place, its rights and responsibilities, and what is already functioning.
  2. Prove one useful connection. Select a bounded project—such as a rain garden, an envelope retrofit or a shared repair workshop—with an operator, a maintenance budget and a comparison against present conditions.
  3. Carry the learning forward. Publish costs, labor, performance and failures alongside the model. Expand only where the evidence and the community support it; adapt the method to the next place.

The artifact worth copying is a working relationship between people, place and the systems that sustain them.

Return to the seven modules
Author's Note

A game about the year 2070.

Some of this work was learned somewhere I ought to credit: a city-builder called Anno 2070, released in 2011 and set on the drowned coastlines of a warmed world. It offered three ways to live. The Tycoons of Global Trust built fast and dirty — smokestacks, oil, quarterly logic with a skyline. The Ecos of the Eden Initiative built slow and clean — wind, tide, patience rendered in white and green. And between them, belonging to neither, stood the Techs: the researchers of S.A.A.T., keepers of the deep-sea labs, a third estate that sold knowledge to both sides and answered to the question rather than the flag. Every serious player ends up needing all three. That triangle — extraction, ecology, and know-how as the unaligned power between them — is all over Atlas and the Codex, and Sherwood's Greenwood Institute is a direct descendant of those underwater laboratories.

But the game's quiet masterstroke was a single number: the ecobalance. Every island kept one, and the world itself obeyed it. Let it drop and you watched the ledger of return run backward — fertility falling, yields thinning, the trees standing grey, the light going flat and smog-brown until the island read as lifeless: a place value passed through on its way to somewhere else. Push it positive and the same renderer paid you back in kind: a bright, ethereal glow settling over everything, greens gone saturated, birds and whales returning, the whole island dynamic and humming and visibly alive. The reward for balance was never a score. It was atmosphere. You optimized toward the glow because the glow was the truth — the economy sat downstream of the living ledger, and the game refused to let you unsee it. Yields were not the measure of the island's health; they were its consequence.

That meter is a seed of Atlas and of the companion Sherwood exhibition. It taught in an evening what Sherwood's ten chapters argue at length: throughput is the economy we already have — value entering a place, passing through it, exiting as yield and waste, dimming the island as it goes. The counter-book is nature's, and Sherwood would keep it literally: a ledger of return, audited in soil moisture and canopy and the steadiness of a stream, where money is only ever a verb and the visible world brightens as the balance climbs. A game is a rehearsal space, nothing more; its rates were toys, like the illustrative rates in Sherwood. But rehearsal is where instinct is built. Sherwood is what happens when a player puts the controller down and asks why the real renderer shouldn't obey the same number.

— R.

Anno 2070, Related Designs & Ubisoft Blue Byte (2011) — the ecobalance mechanic. The description reflects the game as remembered inspiration, not documentation.