Exhibition · Der Erd-Biokondensator · Natural Cycles

Water helps close an electrical circuit at the scale of a planet.

The hydrological cycle lifts water into the atmosphere, where convection, supercooled droplets, ice crystals and graupel help electrify storms. This exhibition follows that moving water into the measured electrical connection between Earth, electrified clouds and the ionosphere — and then separates that science from Schauberger's planetary “bio-condenser” interpretation.

The global atmospheric electric circuit is established geophysics. A leaky capacitor is a useful analogy for the conductive Earth and ionosphere separated by weakly conducting air, while thunderstorms and electrified shower clouds supply generator current. Schauberger's conclusion resembles that circuit; his proposed stack of +4 °C water layers does not. The resemblance and the mechanism must be judged separately.

The global atmospheric electric circuit

In clean fair-weather conditions, the near-surface electric field is commonly of order 100–150 volts per metre and points downward, though weather, aerosols, terrain and structures can change it greatly. The conductive ionosphere is maintained at roughly +250,000 volts relative to the conductive surface. Between them lies weakly conducting air. The result behaves approximately like a leaky spherical capacitor, with a small continuous current through the atmosphere.

Your browser does not support this animated atmospheric-circuit diagram. The surrounding text provides the full explanation.
The circuit, simplified. Thunderstorms and electrified shower clouds drive upward generator current toward the ionosphere. Across fair-weather regions, a tiny downward conduction current returns toward Earth's surface. Integrated globally, the current is of order 1–2 kA; without the disturbed-weather generators, the potential would relax over several minutes.
THE GENERATOR

Thunderstorms charge the battery

Modern estimates vary with definitions and observing method. Global-circuit models commonly use roughly 1,000 active thunderstorms, while satellite measurements place the worldwide lightning-flash rate near 45–50 flashes per second. In mixed-phase clouds, collisions among ice crystals, graupel and supercooled droplets transfer charge; smaller ice is often lofted positive and graupel often falls negative, although polarity can reverse with temperature and liquid-water content. Electrified shower clouds also contribute current even without dramatic lightning.

THE LEAKAGE

Fair weather is the return path

In clear air, cosmic rays and natural radioactivity maintain small ions, so the atmosphere is not a perfect insulator. The fair-weather conduction current is only about 1–3 picoamperes per square metre, yet integrates to roughly 1–2 kA globally. Under clean fair-weather conditions, a person at the surface is standing within the broad return path of that circuit.

THE CLOCK

The Carnegie curve

Measurements made aboard the research vessel Carnegie, far from many local disturbances, revealed a universal-time daily rhythm in fair-weather potential gradient, with a broad maximum near 19:00 UT. Its relationship to the global distribution of electrified-cloud activity strongly supports the Carnegie curve as a signature of the planetary circuit, although local weather, pollution and aerosols can obscure it at individual sites.

THE RESONANCE

Schumann resonances

The cavity between the conductive ground and ionosphere behaves as a resonator, excited mainly by lightning-generated electromagnetic waves. Its fundamental mode is near 7.8 Hz, with variable higher modes shaped by ionospheric conditions. This measured geophysical resonance does not by itself establish a therapeutic, consciousness-altering or other health effect.

His version: the terrestrial bio-condenser

Schauberger arrives at a capacitor image by a different road. Coats's presentation begins with liquid water's relative permittivity — near 80 around room temperature, but dependent on temperature and frequency — and the fact that atmospheric temperature reverses trend across several layers. Coats then calculates supposed altitudes where the air would pass through +4 °C. Those values are a feature of his reconstruction, not stable measured atmospheric boundaries.

Coats connects tropospheric clouds, polar stratospheric clouds and noctilucent ice clouds into supposed “plates” of pure water arranged around +4 °C levels. The atmosphere does not contain continuous liquid-water films at those heights. Noctilucent clouds, for example, are sparse ice crystals near 80–85 km in extremely cold, tenuous air. Applying bulk liquid water's permittivity to water vapor or sparse ice clouds is not valid.

A partial resemblance

The leaky-capacitor analogy is useful

But the measured circuit has different components.

The conductive surface and ionosphere do maintain a potential difference across weakly conducting air, and electrified clouds supply generator current. Water and ice are essential to thunderstorm microphysics, while atmospheric ions and solar-driven ionization are essential to the return path. The atmosphere's temperature profile is also non-monotonic. Schauberger's analogy is historically interesting, but C. T. R. Wilson and the Carnegie measurements had already established the global-circuit framework; similarity is not evidence of an independent discovery.
The reasoning does not

The plates are in the wrong place

Right answer, wrong derivation.

The useful model has two conducting boundaries — Earth's surface and the ionosphere — and the ionosphere conducts because radiation ionizes gas, not because water sits at a special temperature. Noctilucent clouds are extremely thin ice near roughly −130 °C, not liquid layers at +4 °C. The thermosphere can have a high kinetic temperature while its gas density and heat content remain extremely low. Bulk liquid water's permittivity cannot define the dielectric behavior of the whole atmosphere.
Why this one is worth dwelling on

The comparison is valuable precisely because the resemblance is limited. A charged Earth–ionosphere system is measured; continuous +4 °C water plates are not. Water and ice participate in storm electrification, but they do not form the circuit in the way Coats proposes. Judge the destination and the route separately: a familiar conclusion does not validate the argument used to reach it, and a failed mechanism does not erase every useful observation around it.

Storms, ozone and the vapour budget

The chapter closes by reconnecting atmospheric electricity to the water cycle. Coats gives historical evaporation figures of about 333,000 km³ per year from oceans and 62,000 km³ from land; modern assessments are higher and carry substantial dataset uncertainty, but agree that oceans supply the large majority of global evaporation. Land evapotranspiration — including plant transpiration — is regionally important. Forests can influence moisture recycling and downwind rainfall, but no single land cover controls global climate by itself.

Schauberger also proposed that ozone associated with thunderstorms replenishes the protective stratospheric layer. Modern atmospheric chemistry draws a different boundary: lightning produces nitrogen oxides and alters ozone mainly in the troposphere and upper-troposphere/lower-stratosphere region. It is not recognized as a meaningful source of global stratospheric ozone, which is formed principally through ultraviolet photochemistry.

Established

The global electric circuit, fair-weather field of order 100–150 V/m, Earth–ionosphere potential near 250 kV, picoampere-per-square-metre return current, Carnegie curve and Schumann resonances are all measured geophysics. Thunderstorms and electrified shower clouds are major generators. Lightning chemistry creates nitrogen oxides that influence tropospheric ozone. Oceans provide most global evaporation; evapotranspiration is a major land flux.

Partly right, wrongly ranked

Forest evapotranspiration, atmospheric moisture recycling and some downwind rainfall effects are well supported, while the specific “biotic pump” pressure mechanism remains debated and land-cover responses vary by region and scale. Water vapor is the atmosphere's strongest natural greenhouse contributor and acts as a rapid positive feedback; long-lived gases such as CO₂ provide persistent forcing that drives much of the modern increase.

Not supported

That thunderstorm chemistry meaningfully replenishes the global stratospheric ozone layer; that +4 °C strata form water-based condenser plates in the upper atmosphere; or that a broad decline in worldwide thunderstorm frequency can be inferred from local impressions. These are distinct testable claims, and the evidence cited here does not support them.

“In the process of falling, these droplets of water generate a charge…”

Coats presents this as Schauberger's explanation of lightning. Modern storm electrification is more complex, involving mixed-phase ice collisions, convection, precipitation and electric discharge.

Callum Coats's secondary presentation · Living Energies, ch. 6
THE CODEXAll sections